<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Excalibur Partners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.excaliburtech.net/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net</link>
	<description>Technical References</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:08:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Polycom Soft Keys and Exchange UM</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/162</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asterisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange UM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polycom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Asterisk 1.6, FreePBX, and Exchange UM I mentioned how to setup an extension to transfer a caller to voicemail. Let&#8217;s take this one step further and add a soft key on the Polycom. Instead of having to dial ##407ext, you will be able to press the Xfer VM button and it will prompt for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/162/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polycom BLF with Astersisk</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/147</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asterisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreePBX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polycom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are two methods of setting up BLF on Polycom phones. The first gives you idle or inuse status only. A ringing phone will show up with a solid inuse light. The good thing about this method is users can create BLF for extensions themselves. If this is all you need start by enabling the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/147/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asterisk 1.6, FreePBX and Exchange UM</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/130</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/130#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asterisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange UM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreePBX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Setting up Asterisk 1.6.1 and FreePBX 2.5 or 2.6 to work with Exchange 2007 UM is easier than Asterisk 1.4 thanks to Asterisk 1.6 including support for SIP over TCP. However only Asterisk 1.6.1.4 and lower work without modification.
The ability to redirect according to Moved Temporarily response from Exchange UM broken in versions 1.6.1.5 and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/130/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asterisk and FreePBX Caller Initiated Blind Transfers</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/126</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asterisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreePBX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you place a call and perform a blind transfer Asterisk will continue dialplan execution with a result of ANSWER. This causes an issue with FreePBX as it thinks dialing on the trunk failed. The transfer will go through, but you receive the all circuits are busy message.
The first time I reported this issue to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/126/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Configure VMware Time Sync from the Console</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/122</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/122#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware Tools provides the VMware Toolbox application to configure the time sync option for the guest operating system. This works great with Windows guests or Linux guests using the X11 GUI. However all my Linux guests run without the X11 GUI. If you know the current setting of the time synchronization option you can use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/122/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Local vs Domain SID Cloning Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/117</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you install Windows a security identifier (SID) is assigned to the machine. This SID is used for local authentication purposes and is stored in the registry and used to assign ACLs to folders and files on the NTFS file system.
In a workgroup setting each computer needs to have its own unique SID. This becomes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing Dell OpenManage on ESXi 4</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/92</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/92#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenManage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the advantages ESX had over ESXi was the ability to install Dell&#8217;s OpenManage Server Administrator software in the service console. While reading the VMware ESXi Chronicles blog I came across the following, which made wonder how I was going to manage an ESXi host. 
&#8220;In the future, ESXi’s superior architecture will be the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/92/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESX 4 CentOS Guest Showing Udev Unknown Key</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/83</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/83#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excaliburtech.net/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After installing VMware Tools on a CentOS 5.3 guest hosted on ESX 4 I was receiving the following udev warnings during startup.


Starting udev: udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'SUBSYSTEMS'
udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{vendor}'
udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{model}'
udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'SUBSYSTEMS'
udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{vendor}'
udevd&#91;572&#93;: add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{model}'

While they are harmless I personally find them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/83/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing SquidGuard 1.4 on CentOS 5</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/46</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/46#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excalibur-partners.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SquidGuard is an excellent content filter that integrates with the Squid proxy software. Unfortunately CentOS only includes an RPM for Squid, and Fedora and Diag Wieers only had version 1.2 available.
The best solution was to update the Diag Wieers RPM since it was already for CentOS 5. SquidGuard installs as squidGuard, but the Dag Wieers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/46/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AudioPara Volume and Distortion Solved</title>
		<link>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/43</link>
		<comments>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/43#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excalibur-partners.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could never hear anybody with the AT&#038;T AudioPara4 file. I performed the registry tweak to switch to the stock AudioPara3 file. You can use Diamond Tweak to accomplish this as well with the 100db European Limit tweak. This improved the volume but distorted the speakerphone at the higher levels.
For those not using Diamond Tweak [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.excaliburtech.net/archives/43/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
